If you want to determine who your most effective leaders are, you don’t need to evaluate their resumes or observe how well they command a room. Instead, ask this simple question: “When was the last time they attended leadership training?”
Research consistently shows that the most impactful leaders—those who build positive cultures, inspire exceptional performance, and evolve continuously—are those who actively seek leadership development. They read leadership books, participate in workshops, and embrace feedback. Not because they’re lacking, but because they recognize that leadership is like a muscle—it weakens when neglected.
Conversely, ineffective leaders often avoid these opportunities. They may believe they already “know it all” and dismiss the importance of feedback or coaching. The data is clear: a leader’s willingness to invest in their growth signals emotional intelligence, humility, and competence.
The Self-Awareness Paradox: Why Poor Leaders Think They Excel
One of the most paradoxical insights from behavioral science is the tendency of the least competent individuals to overestimate their abilities. This phenomenon, known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, is particularly evident in leadership.
A groundbreaking study by researchers from Rutgers, Cornell, and Columbia revealed that managers with low emotional intelligence were often unaware of their shortcomings. Even when provided with constructive feedback, these individuals dismissed it or questioned its relevance. As a result, they were the least likely to seek improvement. In contrast, the best leaders actively sought out coaching, training, and resources to enhance their skills.
This aligns with findings from other studies, including research by Cornell and University of London scientists, which found that low-ability individuals overestimated their skills and resisted corrective information. The leaders who most need development often avoid it entirely.
Leadership Training as a Marker of Intelligence and Growth
Leadership IQ surveyed over 3,000 leaders to assess proficiency across 18 essential leadership skills, such as managing hybrid teams and delivering effective feedback. The results were sobering: only 19% were proficient at reducing burnout, 31% at managing difficult personalities, and 28% at overseeing hybrid teams. These are fundamental skills for modern leadership, yet many leaders overestimated their abilities while skipping training opportunities.
In contrast, top-performing leaders consistently sought development. Their behavior underscores intellectual humility, a trait essential for great leadership. By attending training, seeking coaching, or reading leadership books, they demonstrate a commitment to improvement. This mindset not only benefits them personally but elevates the entire organization.
The Irony of Poor Leadership: Avoiding the Growth They Need
In many organizations, the leaders most in need of training are the least likely to pursue it. One study by Leadership IQ surveyed over 21,000 employees to evaluate their leaders’ performance in core areas like communication and mentoring. The findings were alarming:
- Only 20% of employees felt their leader actively helped them grow.
- Just 16% said their leader consistently removed obstacles to success.
- Only 26% reported constructive responses to employee concerns.
These deficits highlight a broader issue: most leadership programs fail to address these fundamental gaps. Despite increasing workplace demands, many leaders lack the skills to rise to the challenge, largely because they don’t recognize their own deficiencies.
Why Great Leaders Embrace Development
The best leaders view training as elite conditioning rather than a remedial measure. They continually ask, “How can I get better?” They seek feedback, embrace challenges, and welcome environments where their ideas are tested. This isn’t insecurity; it’s a sign of confidence in their capacity to grow.
Organizations with training-averse leaders experience slower innovation, higher disengagement, and weaker performance. In contrast, companies led by proactive learners excel. They attract top talent, adapt to change quickly, and foster resilient cultures. Leaders who invest in their development inspire their teams to do the same.
Reframing Leadership Training: A Strategic Advantage
Leadership training should not be seen as punishment for underperformance. Instead, it must be positioned as a strategic priority. Framing training as a privilege for growth-oriented leaders transforms organizational culture. The best leaders will rush to take part, ask insightful questions, and model a mindset of continuous improvement.
Think of elite athletes: they train not because they’re weak, but because they aim to remain strong. Similarly, leadership training should be perceived as preparation for excellence, not compliance.
Show Me Your Learners, I’ll Show You Your Leaders
If you’re an executive or HR leader, audit your training attendance over the past year. Who participated in leadership development? Who sought coaching, completed modules, or engaged in peer reviews? Now compare that list to your top performers.
The connection between leadership effectiveness and a commitment to growth is both anecdotal and empirical. Leaders who neglect their own development are unlikely to effectively develop others. Great leadership is teachable, but only to those willing to learn.
So, the next time you evaluate a leader, don’t focus solely on their charisma or track record. Instead, ask this: “When was the last time they participated in leadership training?” The answer might reveal everything you need to know.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.